Florida Litigation Guide
REFER A CASE TO ATTORNEY MARC WITES

Florida Litigation Guide

The invaluable online tool for litigation and transactional attorneys

  • THE AUTHOR
  • THE GUIDE
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • Testimonials
  • Free Chapter
  • Login
  • My Account

Standards on Appeal: Abuse of Discretion

1 – Elements and Case Citations

The abuse of discretion standard requires an appellate court to affirm the trial court’s ruling “unless no reasonable person would adopt the trial court’s view.” May v. State, 326 So.3d 188, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021) citing Salazar v. State, 991 So. 2d 364, 372 (Fla. 2008). See also Lewis v. Juliano, 242 So. 3d 1146, 1148 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). This is known as “the reasonableness test.” Kaye v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co., 985 So. 2d 675, 677 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). “This test holds that the appellant must show clear error by the trial court in its interpretation of the facts and the use of its judgment.” Id.

Subscribers To The Florida Litigation Guide Can See:

  • The rest of the elements for this cause of action;
  • The citations to the most recent state and federal court cases citing the cause of action;
  • The statute of limitations; and
  • The defenses to this cause of action.

Click Here To See A Sample Chapter From The Guide

Subscribe to The Florida Litigation Guide To Access Everything!

Filed Under: Guide Chapters - 2

  • 1* Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110(d), and Other Standard Defenses
  • 2Abuse of Process
  • 3Account Stated
  • 4Accounting
  • 5Assault
  • 6Battery
  • 7Breach: 01. Breach of Contract
  • 8Breach: 02. Breach of Joint Venture Agreement
  • 9Breach: 03. Breach of Promissory Note
  • 10Breach: 04. Breach of Third-Party Beneficiary Contract
  • 11Breach: 05. Breach of Implied in Fact Contract
  • 12Breach: 06. Breach of Implied in Law Contract
  • 13Breach: 07. Breach Implied Covenant of Good Faith & Fair Dealing
  • 14Breach: 08. Breach of Express Warranty
  • 15Breach: 09. Breach of Implied Warranty
  • 16Breach: 10. Breach of Implied Warranty of Fitness for a Particular Purpose
  • 17Breach: 11. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • 18Civil Conspiracy
  • 19Contribution – Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act
  • 20Conversion
  • 21Copyright Infringement
  • 22Declaratory Judgment
  • 23Defamation by Implication
  • 24Defamation Libel
  • 25Defamation Per Se
  • 26Defamation Slander
  • 27Dog Bite Common Law
  • 28Emotional Distress, Intentional Infliction
  • 29Emotional Distress, Negligent Infliction
  • 30Estoppel, Equitable
  • 31Estoppel, Promissory
  • 32False Imprisonment
  • 33Fraud
  • 34Fraud – Constructive
  • 35Fraud – Fraud in the Performance
  • 36Fraud – Fraudulent Inducement
  • 37Fraud – Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  • 38Fraud – Negligent Misrepresentation
  • 39Indemnification
  • 40Injunction Permanent
  • 41Temporary Injunction
  • 42Injurious Falsehood
  • 43Invasion of Privacy
  • 44Invasion of Privacy – Appropriation
  • 45Invasion of Privacy – Intrusion
  • 46Invasion of Privacy – Public Disclosure of Private Facts
  • 47Legal Malpractice
  • 48Loss of Consortium – Child
  • 49Loss of Consortium – Spouse
  • 50Malicious Prosecution
  • 51Money Lent
  • 52Negligence
  • 53Negligence Fall Down
  • 54Negligence Motor Vehicle
  • 55Negligence Stillbirth
  • 56Negligent Destruction of Evidence
  • 57Negligent Retention
  • 58Negligent Security
  • 59Negligent Supervision
  • 60Open Account
  • 61Parental Liability for Tort of Minor
  • 62Quantum Meruit
  • 63Rescission
  • 64Slander of Title
  • 65Specific Performance
  • 66Strict Liability
  • 67Subrogation, Equitable
  • 68Tortious Interference: 1. With Advantageous Business Relationship
  • 69Tortious Interference: 2. With a Contractual Right
  • 70Tortious Interference: 3. With a Dead Body
  • 71Tortious Interference: 4. With the Parent-Child Relationship
  • 72Trade Dress Infringement
  • 73Trusts, Constructive Trust
  • 74Trusts, Resulting Trust
  • 75Unfair Competition
  • 76Unfair Competition – Trade Name, Service Mark and Trade Mark Infringement
  • 77Unjust Enrichment
  • 78Wrongful Death
  • 79Wrongful Interference with Testamentary Expectancy
Florida Litigation Guide
  • THE AUTHOR
  • THE GUIDE
  • TABLE OF CONTENTS
  • Testimonials
  • Free Chapter
  • Login
  • My Account
REFER A CASE TO ATTORNEY MARC WITES
© 1997 to 2022 - Litigation Guide Publishing, LLC | Terms and Conditions | Who designed this website?

Copyright 2023 – The Florida Litigation Guide